ANDERSON DAILY PHOTO

January 29, 2010

Folk Victorian?

Part of the charm of Anderson’s Boulevard Historic District is the variation in homes along its shady streets. Lately I’ve been going on and on about the Tudor Revivals. The above house (check here for a full view) has an entirely different feel. I reached back into my memory to call it “Victorian.” After Googling, I had my “hand” swatted by at least a couple writers, claiming that “Victorian is a time period, not an architectural style.” Hmmm…

It appears that the above style of home — Folk Victorian — is probably the most common within the Victorian period. Such homes can be quite beautiful, with intricate detailing. For example, I LOVE the texture in the side gable, shown above, as well as the brackets under the eaves and the adorable diamond-shaped window. Not to mention the large porch in the full-view picture. With such components, why isn’t this home labeled a Queen Anne, one of the more distinctive styles built during the Victorian period? Well…I’m not an expert, but relying on Google, I would say that the above home is too symmetrical in body (or massing?). There are no turrets, bay windows, or an asymmetrical structure that would scream Queen Anne. Folk Victorian homes were typically enhanced by skilled carpenters, rather than designed by architects. The advant of the rail road and readily available machine-made parts made such detailing affordable to Anderson’s middle and business class. Do you agree with this conclusion of Folk Victorian?

after more Googling, I have to admit that style naming is imperfect, which makes it even more fun. It seems to be that during the “Victorian” period of architecture, there were several different distinct archtectural styles. Perhaps the most common, the Folk Victorian. This i

Advertisements

January 27, 2010

Young Boxer

Filed under: Animals — lessie @ 7:23 pm

An archive photo from PetSmart. The above fella came around the corner and shocked me with his gorgeousness. And he was a sweetie too. And can’t forget to mention, very interested in greeting the other dog in the lower right of the photo.

January 26, 2010

Forlorn or Just Nosey?

Filed under: Animals — lessie @ 9:56 pm

A true snapshot — that I love. Cocoa is a dear neighbor; a sweet little Boxer who wiggles so much, she’s hard to hug. (I hate that my focus seems to be more on the tree than on Cocoa — but, alas, such is life. 🙂 )

January 25, 2010

New Puppy

Filed under: Animals — lessie @ 4:35 am

I grabbed this snapshot a few weeks ago in PetSmart. THere were several new puppies in the store, I imagine from Christmas.

January 24, 2010

Tudor Arch

Another view of the above pic is here. This house is one of my favorites, and not just on Boulevard. I’ve admired it a long time and even have posted a pic of it in years past, but I didn’t know then that it is a Tudor Revival. (I like having lables for things. Makes my crazy life seem more orderly. 🙂 ) That amazing, lucious front-door arch? A “Tudor Arch.” I love how the brick, the wooden door, and frame all echo the shape. The two front (steeply arched) overlapping gables also cry “Tudor.” This is the first home I’ve noticed though with such intricate detailed brick work at the peak of each gable (and also at the base of the second gable). Lastly, notice the lonely dormer at the left? From what I understand, a dormer is a window in a sloping roof, an additional Tudor element. Just adorable. A picture of the entire house is here. Check out the “chimney pots” at the top of the chimney. Yes, another Tudor characteristic. 🙂

January 23, 2010

Group of Three

I love how the two side windows in this grouping of three are slightly smaller than the middle one. Cool detail, huh? (Much better than those energy efficient replacement windows I’m honestly tempted by. ) I’m still on my Historic-Boulevard-District-Tudor-Revival kick. And this older beauty must be a Tudor. (I’m such a rooter for the small house. 🙂 ) From my little bit of Googling, Tudor Revivals often have steeply pitched gables (the one on this house is frankly pretty flat — but there is a quasi-second gable);  decorative brackets under the roof — like the ones above and in this picture; and a mixture of stucco and brick and decorative wood timbering. Tudor Revival. Do you agree?

January 20, 2010

Tudor Revival?

The Boulevard Historical District (a local designation) contains architecturally interesting homes — both large, medium, and small. I’m guessing the above charmer is a Tudor Revival. Do you agree? A picture of one similar is found on page 23 of “Historic Districts in Anderson, South Carolina.” I love the white wood. (I wonder if that is what the article means by “half-timbering.”) And, of course, the diamond-patterned window panes. Very cool. (You can tell it was overcast this past Sunday. I barely got the pics taken before the rain started.) Another view of the above pic is here. Though the front perspective is possibly more charming, the above view allows us to see the gorgeous side gable and the depth of the front two gables, where the entry way is more prominent.

January 19, 2010

Signs of Age

Filed under: Boulevard Historic District (Local Designation) — lessie @ 10:59 pm

In addition to beautiful old trees, Boulevard sports brick paths with long-enduring moss. The above doesn’t do it justice. (Another view of the pic is here.) Taller grass-like moss (?) is shown here.

January 17, 2010

Central Pres

Filed under: Churches, Schools, & Nonprofits — lessie @ 6:44 pm

I couldn’t leave the grounds of Central Presbyterian Church without a picture of the church itself. I took the above with my wide setting, 18 mm, and you can tell it’s a bit distorted. However, I love getting it all in a shot. Sorry for the shadows!

January 16, 2010

Bell Tower

Filed under: Churches, Schools, & Nonprofits — lessie @ 6:07 pm

Central Presbyterian Church, located on Boulevard, has an interesting bell tower in its grounds. (An up-close is below.) You can tell the light for the pic wasn’t optimum; unfortunately the steeple is pretty washed out, but hopefully it’s an accurate image, nonetheless. (I took this pic last Sunday. Sat., Jan. 16, was dark and overcast and the rain came in about mid-day.)

Older Posts »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.